新书推介:《语义网技术体系》
作者:瞿裕忠,胡伟,程龚
   >>中国XML论坛<<     W3CHINA.ORG讨论区     计算机科学论坛     SOAChina论坛     Blog     开放翻译计划     新浪微博  
 
  • 首页
  • 登录
  • 注册
  • 软件下载
  • 资料下载
  • 核心成员
  • 帮助
  •   Add to Google

    >> 讨论HTML、XHTML、Web2.0、Ajax、XUL, ExtJS, jQuery, JSON、Social Networking System(SNS)、Rich Internet Applications (RIA)、Tagging System、Taxonomy(tagsonomy,folkonomy)、XForms、XFrames、XInclude, XBL (XML Binding Language)等话题
    [返回] 中文XML论坛 - 专业的XML技术讨论区XML.ORG.CN讨论区 - XML技术『 HTML/XHTML/Ajax/Web 2.0/Web 3.0 』 → [转载]W3C XForms 1.0 Hailed as Standard 查看新帖用户列表

      发表一个新主题  发表一个新投票  回复主题  (订阅本版) 您是本帖的第 7698 个阅读者浏览上一篇主题  刷新本主题   树形显示贴子 浏览下一篇主题
     * 贴子主题: [转载]W3C XForms 1.0 Hailed as Standard 举报  打印  推荐  IE收藏夹 
       本主题类别:     
     admin 帅哥哟,离线,有人找我吗?
      
      
      
      威望:9
      头衔:W3China站长
      等级:计算机硕士学位(管理员)
      文章:5255
      积分:18407
      门派:W3CHINA.ORG
      注册:2003/10/5

    姓名:(无权查看)
    城市:(无权查看)
    院校:(无权查看)
    给admin发送一个短消息 把admin加入好友 查看admin的个人资料 搜索admin在『 HTML/XHTML/Ajax/Web 2.0/Web 3.0 』的所有贴子 点击这里发送电邮给admin  访问admin的主页 引用回复这个贴子 回复这个贴子 查看admin的博客楼主
    发贴心情 [转载]W3C XForms 1.0 Hailed as Standard

    http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3091961

    October 14, 2003
    W3C XForms 1.0 Hailed as Standard
    By Clint Boulton
    It's official.

    The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Tuesday announced XForms 1.0 as an official recommendation, paving the way for a new way to present information via the Web as an improvement over Hypertext Markup Language (HTML).

    Web-based, or electronic forms such as XForms 1.0, combine the ability to separate purpose, presentation and results with the Extensible Markup Language (XML). They were created as the next generation of rendering information and performing tasks on the Web because HTML is limited to simple tasks, such as Web page creation.

    For example, Web consumers today want to be able to access the Web through smartphones and handheld devices, which require more functionality forms and non-Web-based forms technologies.

    By the same token, enterprises want to be able to conduct more complex transactions such as e-commerce and Web-enable business processes, such as supply chain management systems. XForms will improve these functions.

    As the complexity of applications and sophistication of devices has increased, HTML has become increasingly limiting for developers. The W3C sees XForms as the answer and as open standard alternative to proprietary Web forms technologies from Microsoft and Adobe.

    Forms authors are looking to cut down on the amount of scripting and reuse form components, integrate them into Web services, and deliver functionality to users and devices previously not possible, said Steven Pemberton, Chair of the W3C XForms Working Group. It also separates the lines of function and presentation markup, which are so convoluted in HTML.

    Redmonk Senior Analyst Stephen O'Grady said X-Forms is a technology that will become increasingly important in enterprise-based implementations and consumer-facing applications, noting that a standards-based approach to forms generation, delivery and consumption is likely to be of considerable interest to most verticals, particularly government and financial services.

    "And as with any standard, one of the most important considerations in its evaluation is its vendor support, and X-Forms doesn't disappoint there with firms like Adobe, IBM, Novell, Oracle, and Sun on the working group," O'Grady told internetnews.com. "Not a bad place to start. Notably absent, of course, is Microsoft as it's pursuing a different course with XDocs [now called, InfoPath], but we're of the opinion that with the vendors it has backing it now X-Forms has a bright future ahead of it."

    While XForms has been in progress for a few years, Microsoft's InfoPath and Adobe's PDF Reader have come on strong in the last several months. Microsoft will package InfoPath, aimed squarely at the knowledge worker and small group collaboration, with Office.

    Adobe is using its portable document format (PDF) as the foundation to create electronic forms, allowing users to deploy forms in Adobe's Portable Document Format (PDF) or in an XML Data Package (XDP) as desired.

    Meta Group's Thomas Murphy said he will remain a bit skeptical about XForms until he sees how the market takes to it.

    "The question for XForms will be how it gets packaged and how this will market vs. Microsoft," he told internetnews.com. "Since InfoPath is already available (of course Microsoft has to convince people to upgrade) and XForms is just a recommendation with a bunch of more minor players involved. All of the development community is pretty focused specifically around Java and .NET and .NET does has a story that is more willing to support something like XForms/Infopath. Certainly people are looking for ways to build richer user interfaces and this is a potential way to do it but I wonder who is the real target audience and how does this effectively compete."

    W3C spokesperson Janet Daly told internetnews.com government organizations are highly interested in this technology to move services and functionality to the Web. She also noted that InfoPath has been cobbled together as a forms technology with standards employed by the W3C.

    In practical terms, Daly said that unlike HTML, technologies based on XForms make it possible to offer the same form to a PDA, a cell phone, or desktop without loss of functionality for the user.

    It functions by allowing developers to specify the properties and relationships of values being collected. For example, it asserts that a particular field must be an e-mail address, that the total amount field is the sum of the individual line items, or that a credit card number isn't required if payment is by cash. The Web browser can always warn the user of any incorrectly filled fields before the form is submitted.

    The XForms Working Group includes W3C Members and invited experts from Adobe; CWI; Cardiff; Helsinki University of Technology; IBM; Mozquito Technologies; Novell; Oracle Corporation; Origo Services; PureEdge; SAP; Sun Microsystems; and x-port.net Ltd.


       收藏   分享  
    顶(0)
      




    ----------------------------------------------

    -----------------------------------------------

    第十二章第一节《用ROR创建面向资源的服务》
    第十二章第二节《用Restlet创建面向资源的服务》
    第三章《REST式服务有什么不同》
    InfoQ SOA首席编辑胡键评《RESTful Web Services中文版》
    [InfoQ文章]解答有关REST的十点疑惑

    点击查看用户来源及管理<br>发贴IP:*.*.*.* 2004/2/17 17:57:00
     
     GoogleAdSense
      
      
      等级:大一新生
      文章:1
      积分:50
      门派:无门无派
      院校:未填写
      注册:2007-01-01
    给Google AdSense发送一个短消息 把Google AdSense加入好友 查看Google AdSense的个人资料 搜索Google AdSense在『 HTML/XHTML/Ajax/Web 2.0/Web 3.0 』的所有贴子 点击这里发送电邮给Google AdSense  访问Google AdSense的主页 引用回复这个贴子 回复这个贴子 查看Google AdSense的博客广告
    2025/10/4 8:43:34

    本主题贴数1,分页: [1]

    管理选项修改tag | 锁定 | 解锁 | 提升 | 删除 | 移动 | 固顶 | 总固顶 | 奖励 | 惩罚 | 发布公告
    W3C Contributing Supporter! W 3 C h i n a ( since 2003 ) 旗 下 站 点
    苏ICP备05006046号《全国人大常委会关于维护互联网安全的决定》《计算机信息网络国际联网安全保护管理办法》
    62.500ms